Study the Statistics
Gabriel Calzada Álvarez, PhD, an economics professor at King Juan Carlos University in Madrid, completed Spain’s first comprehensive review of the long-term effects of Spain’s renewable energy policy on jobs and the economy. His report, "Study of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to Renewable Energy Sources," was released in March. Some of its most surprising findings include these:
-
The premium paid for renewable power in Spain that’s charged to consumers translates into $774,000 for each Spanish "green job" created since 2000. In an interview with Bloomberg, Álvarez stated: "The loss of jobs could be greater if you account for the amount of lost industry that moves out of the country due to higher energy prices."
-
The study calculates that the programs creating those jobs resulted in the destruction of nearly 110,000 jobs elsewhere in the economy, or 2.2 jobs destroyed for every "green job" created. The report notes that Obama’s estimates of job creation gloss over jobs lost due to lost opportunity in the private capital market or the higher efficiency of private capital employed in renewable energy investment. Álvarez concluded that each "green" megawatt installed destroys 5.28 jobs on average elsewhere in the economy: 8.99 by photovoltaics, 4.27 by wind energy, and 5.05 by mini-hydro.
-
The study also assessed the quality of green jobs created. Despite its hyper-aggressive (expensive and extensive) "green jobs" policies, it appears that Spain has created a surprisingly low number of jobs. Two-thirds of them came in construction, fabrication and installation; one-quarter in administrative positions, marketing, and projects engineering; and just one-tenth at the more permanent level of actual operation and maintenance.
-
Money paid by consumers for renewable energy from 2000 to 2008 amounted to approximately $10 billion more than what the market cost would have been. The government spent more than $36 billion to subsidize renewable projects. For perspective, Spain’s economy is roughly on par with California’s.
-
"The price of a comprehensive energy rate (paid by the end consumer) in Spain would have to be increased 31% to begin to repay the historic debt generated [by the subsidies]," the report says. This is an important point: Direct government investment in power generation infrastructure hides the real cost of generated electricity because the government debt does not appear in the utilities’ books and keeps rates artificially low. Álvarez called these "self-inflicted economic wounds."
-
"The high cost of electricity due to the green job policy tends to drive the relatively most energy-intensive companies and industries away, seeking areas where costs are lower." Spain’s average electricity rate for a medium household was 15.2 cents/kWh in 2008, according to Eurostat — among the highest in the European Union (EU). The average U.S. residential price of electricity is less than 10 cents/kWh.
Not a Policy Model
The irony is that Spain’s entire renewable industry was built on the promise of creating millions of new, high-paying "green jobs" while simultaneously meeting EU requirement for reducing carbon emissions — the same policies now promised by President Obama.
Spain’s renewable energy policies have failed on both measures: Jobs have disintegrated, and Spain’s CO 2 emissions have increased 50% since 2000, according to data from the European Environment Agency, forcing Spain’s purchase of allowances from Eastern Europe to meet its EU-mandated carbon limits. Let’s not repeat these mistakes.
—Dr. Robert Peltier, PE, Editor-in-Chief
Comments (6)
Direct government investment in power generation infrastructure hides the real cost of generated electricity because the government debt does not appear in the utilities’ books and keeps rates artificially low. Álvarez called these "self-inflicted economic wounds."
Great point! If we paid the real cost (economic, environmental, and social) of coal, gas and other non-renewables the unsubsizided cost of renewable electricity generation would be far less. Even with direct government investment, it's still not even close to being a level playing field for renewables. Society currently subsidizes coal, gas, etc by absorbing all the environmental and social costs, which leads to even larger negative impacts on the economy.
Did I mention wind's capacity factor, oh, it’s about 20%. Nuclear is 90%. Nuclear generation is about 1.72 cents/kWh. Wind, well, it’s about 15 cents/kWh. Which one is more efficient, more reliable and more environmentally friendly? Is there a question?
Short term - go coal, long term - go nuclear. Wind is a distraction from the solution. Live in a land of no subsidies. Let the economics play out - LET FREEDOM REIGN.
YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT. Facts does not matter. This is a new religion we are seeing that is emerging. It is something to give meaning to people - they are there to save the world! You cannot take away that candy by using facts.
No facts will stop this new religion. But we should of course fight it but religions cannot be fought with facts - you need another religion to fight a religion. Why not christianity?
Minister Ryan who is part of the Irish Green Party as promise this is going to be the green Eldorado and nothing is happening, i think they that all the government of Europe are singing the same song to their own public. Ireland is not even near to the target that they have advance to the last meeting in Nairobi. We are buying the green credits also which we were not suppose to.
marc torrades industrial designer